Back

The Ultimate Guide to Deploying Large Language Models Safely and Securely

Learn how to deploy Large Language Models efficiently and securely. See best practices for managing infrastructure, ensuring data privacy, and optimizing for cost without compromising on performance.

Deval Shah
March 7, 2024
March 6, 2024
Learn how to protect against the most common LLM vulnerabilities

Download this guide to delve into the most common LLM security risks and ways to mitigate them.

In-context learning

As users increasingly rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) to accomplish their daily tasks, their concerns about the potential leakage of private data by these models have surged.

[Provide the input text here]

[Provide the input text here]

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, Q: I had 10 cookies. I ate 2 of them, and then I gave 5 of them to my friend. My grandma gave me another 2boxes of cookies, with 2 cookies inside each box. How many cookies do I have now?

Title italic

A: At the beginning there was 10 cookies, then 2 of them were eaten, so 8 cookies were left. Then 5 cookieswere given toa friend, so 3 cookies were left. 3 cookies + 2 boxes of 2 cookies (4 cookies) = 7 cookies. Youhave 7 cookies.

English to French Translation:

Q: A bartender had 20 pints. One customer has broken one pint, another has broken 5 pints. A bartender boughtthree boxes, 4 pints in each. How many pints does bartender have now?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, line first
line second
line third

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, Q: I had 10 cookies. I ate 2 of them, and then I gave 5 of them to my friend. My grandma gave me another 2boxes of cookies, with 2 cookies inside each box. How many cookies do I have now?

Title italic Title italicTitle italicTitle italicTitle italicTitle italicTitle italic

A: At the beginning there was 10 cookies, then 2 of them were eaten, so 8 cookies were left. Then 5 cookieswere given toa friend, so 3 cookies were left. 3 cookies + 2 boxes of 2 cookies (4 cookies) = 7 cookies. Youhave 7 cookies.

English to French Translation:

Q: A bartender had 20 pints. One customer has broken one pint, another has broken 5 pints. A bartender boughtthree boxes, 4 pints in each. How many pints does bartender have now?

Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini are catalyzing a technological revolution with their in-depth language capabilities. They hold potential to upend industries with advanced text and code creation functionalities.

Deploying LLMs is a layered task.

It's not limited to the technical setup—it encompasses addressing security concerns, maintaining privacy, navigating engineering complexities, and achieving cost-effective performance.

Strong infrastructure is paramount for LLMs, which demand considerable processing strength and data storage. A clear grasp of these infrastructure requirements is crucial—without it, LLMs can't live up to their potential.

This guide walks you through the deployment journey, diving into the core principles, operational details, and customization strategies. It's designed to unveil the intricacies of LLMs and best practices to harness their powers securely and adeptly.

At the heart of this guide is a commitment to security—identifying risks, crafting defenses, and fostering a culture of proactive safety measures.

{{Advert}}

Hide table of contents
Show table of contents

Foundations of LLMs and Their Security Implications

Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming how we interact with machines by enabling computers to understand and generate human-like text. They assist in writing, offer data analysis, and converse like humans. But, introducing LLMs into various sectors comes with significant security risks that need careful consideration.

LLMs are based on machine learning (ML), a part of artificial intelligence (AI) that allows software to improve with experience. Machine learning includes different techniques like supervised learning, where the model is trained on labeled data, unsupervised learning, which finds patterns in data without guidance, and reinforcement learning, where models learn through trial and error.

Deep learning, a key part of LLMs, draws inspiration from our brains to make sense of large amounts of data. However, the vast datasets LLMs train on might contain private information, raising concerns about data protection. Moreover, their intricate design makes them susceptible to adversarial attacks—these are situations where someone intentionally feeds the model misleading information to cause incorrect outputs.

Custom vs. Commercial LLMs

When it's time to bring Large Language Models into their operations, organizations face a choice: develop custom models or buy commercial ones. 

Custom LLMs allow organizations to closely manage the training process, which includes customizing security protections. But, they come with a price tag that includes a hefty investment of time and specialized knowledge.

Commercial LLMs, in contrast, are ready to go out of the box, and many have security features already in place. The trade-off is that they might not fit an organization's specific needs perfectly, and depending on third-party providers can introduce concerns over data management and control.

Understanding the risks inherent in the structure and function of LLMs is essential for their secure application.

These risks are more than academic concerns—they have tangible consequences in both online and offline settings.

Adversarial Attacks

LLMs are susceptible to adversarial attacks, a form of cyber threat where attackers manipulate inputs subtly to cause the model to make errors or reveal sensitive information.

The architecture of LLMs, designed to process and generate text based on the patterns learned from vast datasets, can be exploited by crafting inputs that appear normal but are engineered to trigger specific vulnerabilities in the model's understanding.

This vulnerability is partly due to the LLMs' inability to distinguish between legitimate and maliciously crafted inputs. This challenge is compounded by the models' complexity and the opaqueness of their decision-making processes.

Data Privacy Issues in Training Datasets

The training datasets used for LLMs often contain vast amounts of personal and sensitive information.

This is because LLMs require extensive data to learn the nuances of human language. However, this necessity poses significant data privacy issues, as including sensitive information in training datasets can lead to unintentional privacy breaches if the model learns to reproduce or infer personal data.

Moreover, the complexity of LLMs makes it challenging to fully audit the training data for privacy-sensitive information, increasing the risk of data leakage.

To address these challenges, it's crucial to adopt robust mitigation strategies. For adversarial attacks, techniques such as adversarial training, where the model is trained with legitimate and adversarial inputs, can enhance the model's resilience. Additionally, continuous monitoring and updating models in response to new threats are essential for maintaining security.

Pre-Deployment Security Assessment

Pre-deployment security assessment for Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial to ensure their safe and secure operation.

This process involves a comprehensive evaluation that covers identifying vulnerabilities, choosing deployment options, understanding data privacy and compliance, and adhering to a security checklist before deployment. Here's a nuanced approach to conducting such an assessment, leveraging advanced techniques and considerations.

Identifying LLM Vulnerabilities

Red teaming is a vital technique in uncovering and addressing potential LLM vulnerabilities. This adversarial approach involves simulating attacks or undesirable behaviours to identify gaps in security measures. Microsoft's guidance on planning red teaming for LLMs emphasises assembling a diverse group with benign and adversarial mindsets to cover a broad range of security risks. Red teaming can highlight issues like prompt injection, data leakage, and the generation of toxic or biased content, enabling developers to mitigate these risks before deployment.

For instance, Lakera Red is designed to proactively identify a range of security risks including prompt injection attacks, data & prompt leakage, data poisoning, generation of toxic content, and hallucinations.

It leverages the world's most advanced AI threat database and integrates with Lakera Guard for continuous threat monitoring and protection post-deployment. Lakera's approach includes stress-testing AI applications against text and visual prompt injections, as well as jailbreak attempts, to ensure that LLMs do not inadvertently generate harmful content or spread misinformation

Choosing Deployment Options

Deploying LLMs locally or in the cloud carries distinct security considerations.

Cloud deployments may offer advanced security features and easier compliance with data protection regulations but require trust in third-party service providers.

On the other hand, local deployments provide greater control over data but may demand more robust internal security protocols.

Ensuring that external models used for fine-tuning or as plugins in products are secure is crucial, regardless of the deployment option.

Data Privacy and Compliance

Data privacy and compliance are paramount, given the vast amounts of personal and sensitive information LLMs can process.

Leveraging differential privacy techniques and secure multi-party computation can help handle data securely, especially in collaborative LLM training scenarios. 

Tools like Lakera Red provide mechanisms to stress-test AI systems against LLM-specific risks such as data and prompt leakage, ensuring models are aligned with global regulatory standards like the EU AI Act.

Collaborative LLM training

Leveraging differential privacy (DP) techniques and secure multi-party computation (SMPC) can significantly enhance data security in collaborative LLM training scenarios.

Here's how these approaches contribute to secure data handling:

Differential Privacy in Collaborative LLM Training

Differential Privacy (DP) introduces randomness into the training process of LLMs, thereby obfuscating the input data and making it challenging to identify any specific individual's data within the dataset. This method ensures that the output of the LLM does not reveal sensitive information about the individuals in the training data. 

The DP mechanism, specifically Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), is a popular approach that achieves differential privacy by adding noise to the gradients during the model's training phase.

This approach helps in maintaining the privacy of the training data while allowing the model to learn useful representations. The noise addition is calibrated based on a privacy budget that quantifies the amount of privacy or information leakage allowed, ensuring a balance between privacy protection and the utility of the trained model​​.

Secure Multi-Party Computation in Collaborative LLM Training

Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) allows multiple parties to jointly compute a function over their inputs while keeping those inputs private.

In the context of LLM training, SMPC enables different entities to contribute to the training of a model without revealing their sensitive data to other parties.

This approach is particularly useful in scenarios where data cannot be centralized due to privacy concerns or regulatory restrictions. By ensuring that only encrypted data is shared during the training process, SMPC facilitates collaborative learning without compromising data privacy.

Security Checklist Before Deployment

Before deploying LLMs, a security checklist is essential to ensure all vulnerabilities are addressed.

This checklist should include thoroughly testing and evaluating the model for any security gaps, leveraging red teaming and automated techniques. Scale.com highlights the importance of continuously assessing and certifying AI applications for safety against the latest standards, ensuring LLMs are prepared to mitigate identified risks effectively.

**💡Pro Tip: Explore Lakera’s LLM Security Solution Evaluation Checklist. The checklist provides a comprehensive evaluation framework, covering critical aspects of LLM security. It will help you make an informed decision when selecting tools to protect your AI applications.**

A pre-deployment security assessment for LLMs should be comprehensive, covering all angles, from identifying vulnerabilities through red teaming to ensuring compliance with data privacy laws.

Utilising tools and methodologies that specifically cater to the unique security challenges of LLMs, such as Lakera Red for red-teaming and risk assessment, can significantly enhance the security posture of LLM applications before they go live.

Secure Deployment Strategies

Deploying LLMs securely involves careful planning across different environments, such as local on-premises setups and cloud platforms.

Here are comprehensive strategies to ensure security while balancing performance and cost:

Local Deployment Security

For on-premises deployments:

  • Separate Environments: Keep production data isolated from development and testing, using real sensitive data only in production environments.
  • Sensitive Data Handling: Treat embeddings and vectors derived from sensitive data with high security, applying strict role-based access controls (RBAC) to limit access based on necessity​​.

Cloud-Based Deployment Security

Deploying on cloud platforms like Azure and AWS requires:

  • Secure Foundations: Utilize AWS's secure global cloud infrastructure to benefit from in-built security tools and compliance controls. AWS's commitment to security, privacy, and compliance makes it a robust foundation for deploying generative AI applications​​.
  • Network Security Measures: Implement secure communication protocols, firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and control network access. Azure, for example, suggests using private endpoints, firewall rules, and Network Security Groups (NSGs) for comprehensive network security​​.
  • Data Encryption and Access Control: Encrypt data at rest and in transit, using services like Azure Key Vault for key management, and enforce strong authentication mechanisms, including multi-factor authentication​​.

Choosing Secure Tools and Platforms

Selecting tools and platforms with robust security features is crucial:

  • Evaluate the security capabilities of platforms like Hugging Face and LMStudio. Ensure they provide features like RBAC, data encryption, and secure API access.
  • Utilize platforms that align with security best practices and standards, such as the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs​​.

Securing Custom LLMs

  • Risk Management: Adopt a proactive stance on security by anticipating vulnerabilities and considering adversarial scenarios. Regular audits and incident response planning are vital to identify and mitigate potential risks​​.
  • Model Inversion and Data Leakage Mitigation: Address model inversion and training data membership inference attacks by ensuring strict isolation of information and not training on sensitive data. Utilizing a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) architecture can help manage sensitive information more securely​​.

Implementation Suggestions

  • Hybrid Cloud Environments: Consider deploying LLMs in hybrid environments to leverage both on-premises and cloud advantages. Implementing containerization can help encapsulate LLMs, making deployments more secure and manageable.
  • Containerization for Security: Use containers to deploy LLMs as they provide a lightweight, isolated environment. This ensures the consistent operation of LLMs across different computing environments and enhances security by isolating the LLMs from the host system.
  • Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC): Implement RBAC to manage who has access to what within your LLM environment. RBAC ensures that only authorized users can access certain data or systems, reducing the risk of data breaches​​​​.

By following these strategies, organizations can secure their LLM deployments against various threats while maintaining efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Regularly reviewing and updating security measures as technology evolves is also essential to stay ahead of potential vulnerabilities.

Development, Training, and Fine-Tuning with Security in Mind

Developing, training, and fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with a focus on security are crucial steps in safeguarding AI applications against potential threats and vulnerabilities. These practices ensure the integrity of the model and the confidentiality of the data it processes.

Below are the strategies and considerations for implementing security throughout the lifecycle of LLMs, from development to deployment.

Secure Development Practices

Secure coding practices are essential in minimizing vulnerabilities right from the development phase.

This involves adopting coding standards that prevent common security issues, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, in the development of LLM applications.

Utilizing tools for static and dynamic code analysis can help identify and rectify security flaws early.

**💡Pro Tip: Discover the latest in AI security with Lakera's deep-dive into real-world LLM exploits. Explore practical challenges and vulnerabilities encountered by the Lakera Red team in the deployment of Large Language Models.**

Training and Fine-Tuning Securely

Protecting your data and model during the training phase involves careful consideration of data handling and model exposure. To mitigate the risk of data breaches and unauthorized model access, employ encryption for both data at rest and in transit. 

For data at rest, employing strong encryption standards like AES-256 ensures that data, including training datasets and model parameters, remains secure.

For data in transit, protocols such as TLS (Transport Layer Security) provide a secure channel between clients and servers, safeguarding the data exchanged during model training and inference phases. Implementing these encryption measures effectively mitigates risks of data breaches and leaks​​​​.

Leveraging Federated Learning

Federated learning is a powerful technique for training LLMs while maintaining data privacy.

By allowing the model to learn from decentralized data sources without actually moving the data, federated learning minimizes the risk of central data breaches.

This approach is particularly beneficial in scenarios where training data contains sensitive or personal information, as it remains on local devices, and only model updates are shared with the server. Federated learning, therefore, offers a privacy-preserving alternative to traditional centralized training methods​​.

Figure: Federated LLM Pre-training and Fine-tuning (Source)

Prompt Engineering for Security

Prompt engineering is a nuanced method of guiding LLMs to generate desired outputs while minimizing the risks of producing harmful or biased content. This involves carefully crafting prompts and employing filtering mechanisms to control the model's responses. 

Advanced techniques include using context-aware prompts that understand the application's domain and user-specific constraints, thus reducing the likelihood of generating inappropriate content.

Regularly testing models with diverse and challenging prompts helps identify and mitigate potential biases or harmful responses​​.

Model Optimization and Security

Achieving a balance between model optimization and security is imperative for maintaining high-performance LLMs without compromising security.

Implementing strategies such as rate limiting, applying strict Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), and engaging AI Red Teams for security evaluations are vital. These practices help in safeguarding the application against unauthorized access and data leakage, thereby ensuring the security of custom LLMs​​​​.

By adhering to these guidelines and continuously updating security practices in response to evolving threats, developers and organizations can ensure the secure deployment of LLMs, balancing the tremendous capabilities of these models with the need to protect sensitive information and maintain user trust.

Post-Deployment Security Management

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) introduces a set of unique security challenges.

Here, we outline the essential strategies and practices for securing LLMs post-deployment, covering the identification of security vulnerabilities, monitoring and incident response, maintenance, and access control.

Testing for Security Vulnerabilities

Security vulnerabilities in LLMs can range from prompt injections to data leakage and inadequate sandboxing. Identifying these vulnerabilities requires a comprehensive approach that includes both white-box and black-box testing methods. 

**💡Pro Tip: Learn about data exfiltration and AI's pivotal role in both fighting it and making the attacks more sophisticated than ever before.**

White-box testing involves having access to the model details, allowing for a more detailed inspection of the LLM's internal workings. Conversely, black-box testing simulates an external attacker's perspective, focusing on exploiting potential vulnerabilities without knowledge of the internal architecture or parameters of the model​​.

Monitoring and Incident Response

Effective security management of LLMs also involves continuous monitoring and a robust incident response plan.

Monitoring aims to detect unusual behavior or unauthorized access in real time, while incident response focuses on minimizing damage and restoring normal operations as quickly as possible following a security breach.

The setup of a Security Operations Center (SOC) can enhance an organization's ability to monitor security events and respond to incidents efficiently​​.

Anomaly detection in LLM outputs involves monitoring for deviations from normal behavior or outputs, which could indicate a security breach or an attempt to manipulate the model.

Real-time detection systems utilize machine learning algorithms to analyze output patterns and identify anomalies as they occur. This proactive approach enables immediate response to potential threats, ensuring that any unusual activity is swiftly addressed.

Maintaining LLM Security Over Time

The threat landscape is dynamic, with new vulnerabilities emerging regularly.

It is essential to keep LLMs updated and patched to protect against these threats. Continuous vulnerability assessment and penetration testing can help identify and prioritize vulnerabilities for effective remediation.

Adopting a strategic security program management approach, such as GPVUE, can provide a continuous view of an organization's security posture, enabling timely updates and patches​​.

User Authentication and Access Control

To ensure that only authorized users can interact with the LLM, robust user authentication and access control mechanisms must be in place.

This involves implementing strong authentication methods and managing user permissions meticulously to prevent unauthorized access or manipulation of the LLM.

Navigating LLM Deployment Challenges

Navigating the deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) securely and efficiently involves addressing several critical challenges, including the trade-offs between latency and security, understanding the cost implications, and managing resources effectively to maintain high security standards.

Advanced strategies such as adopting a zero-trust architecture for LLM applications, managing the security implications of auto-scaling LLM services, and conducting detailed cost-benefit analyses of different security investments are vital in overcoming these challenges.

Latency and Security Trade-offs

Achieving a balance between performance and security measures is critical. Deploying LLMs with techniques like data, tensor, pipeline, and hybrid parallelism can enhance performance but require careful security considerations to mitigate risks associated with distributed computing environments.

Techniques such as quantization and optimization of attention layers can reduce latency without significantly compromising model quality​​.

Cost Implications of Secure Deployments

Secure deployment of LLMs involves significant financial considerations.

From hardware requirements that support large models and long inputs​​ to the selection of appropriate storage and network infrastructure​​​​, organizations must be prepared for substantial investments.

Efficient use of cloud computing resources, along with smart scheduling and batching of model requests, can optimize costs​​.

Resource Management for Security

Allocating resources effectively to maintain security standards involves configuring cluster management solutions like Kubernetes for model customization and inferencing. These solutions facilitate secure and efficient scaling of LLMs. Additionally, the choice of network infrastructure, particularly InfiniBand connectivity for distributed training, ensures low latency and high-bandwidth communication between nodes, crucial for maintaining both performance and security​​.

Strategies for optimizing infrastructure costs include adopting a smart use of cloud computing resources, considering the scalability challenges, and efficiently managing bandwidth requirements and resource constraints to prevent bottlenecks that could impact both performance and security​​.

Real-World Applications and Security Case Studies

Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in real-world applications calls for a careful consideration of security measures to protect both user data and intellectual property.

Let’s discuss the secure LLM deployment strategies, lessons learned from security incidents, and best practices from the industry.

Case Studies on Secure LLM Deployments

  • Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) for LLMs: One innovative approach to ensuring privacy and security in LLM deployments involves using Fully Homomorphic Encryption. Zama's implementation allows parts of an LLM to operate on encrypted data, maintaining the model owner’s intellectual property (IP) while ensuring the privacy of the user's data. This method involves adapting parts of the model, such as GPT2, to run computations on encrypted data, significantly reducing the risk of data leakage or IP theft​​.
Figure: Client/Server Interaction with Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE)

Lessons Learned from Security Incidents

  • Secure Architecture Reviews: Conducting thorough secure architecture reviews for GenAI applications is essential in mitigating risks associated with AI-driven services. The Cloud Security Alliance offers a comprehensive guide focusing on evaluating the security of GenAI applications. It underlines the importance of understanding the unique challenges GenAI presents, from potential data leaks and privacy concerns to legal ambiguities. 

There should be a structured review process that includes threat modeling, security control review, and risk severity assessment, aiming to ensure that the deployment of GenAI-based applications adheres to the highest standards of security and integrity​​.

Best Practices from the Industry

  • Quantization and FHE: A key takeaway from Zama’s case study is the potential of quantization in maintaining model accuracy while enabling FHE. By quantizing the model weights and activations, the computational overhead of operating on encrypted data can be reduced, allowing secure and efficient deployment of LLMs without significant degradation in performance. This approach not only enhances data security but also ensures that user interactions with the LLM remain private​​.
  • Understanding Internal Architecture for GenAI Security: It's critical to have an in-depth understanding of the internal architecture of GenAI applications to implement effective security measures. This includes evaluating front-end, back-end, and infrastructure controls to protect against adversarial attacks, data poisoning, model inversion attacks, and ensuring data privacy. Establishing a robust evaluation framework for security controls across different components of GenAI applications is essential for safeguarding sensitive information and maintaining the integrity of AI-driven services​​.

These case studies and best practices demonstrate the complexities and innovative solutions involved in securely deploying LLMs across various sectors. By leveraging advanced encryption techniques and conducting detailed security reviews, organizations can navigate the challenges of protecting user privacy and model IP while harnessing the power of LLMs for transformative applications.

Conclusion

Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) is not just a technological leap forward; it's a step that requires a deep commitment to security.

Here's how to ensure their safe integration:

Build a Secure Framework

  • Ensure LLMs operate within ethical guidelines, protecting against vulnerabilities.
  • Secure models operate with respect for privacy and the integrity of data.

Address Security Implications

  • Guard against adversarial attacks aimed at fooling the models.
  • Maintain data privacy to protect users' personal information.

Commit to Ongoing Security

  • Conduct regular security assessments to identify new risks.
  • Monitor LLMs for unusual activity that may indicate a breach.
  • Adapt your security measures to stay ahead of cyber threats.
  • Stay updated with the latest in regulatory compliance.

Security as a Priority

  • Recognize security as a crucial element from the start of LLM deployment.
  • Align your strategies and practices with the discussed considerations.

Maintain Vigilance

  • Recognize LLM deployment as a never-ending process that demands attention.
  • Balance innovation with meticulous security efforts.

Cultivate a Security-First Culture

  • Encourage developers and researchers to prioritize security.
  • Promote awareness and responsibility among organizations.

In summary, to progress securely with LLMs you need to embrace security at each deployment phase, innovate while safeguarding the digital ecosystem, and encourage a holistic view of advancement that pairs new technology with ethical responsibility.

Lakera LLM Security Playbook
Learn how to protect against the most common LLM vulnerabilities

Download this guide to delve into the most common LLM security risks and ways to mitigate them.

Deval Shah
Read LLM Security Playbook

Learn about the most common LLM threats and how to prevent them.

Download
You might be interested

Evaluating Large Language Models: Methods, Best Practices & Tools

Learn what is LLM evaluation and why is it important. Explore 7 effective methods, best practices, and evolving frameworks for assessing LLMs' performance and impact across industries.
Armin Norouzi
December 5, 2023

OpenAI’s CLIP in production

We have released an implementation of OpenAI’s CLIP model that completely removes the need for PyTorch, enabling you to quickly and seamlessly install this fantastic model in production and even possibly on edge devices.
Daniel Timbrell
December 1, 2023
Activate
untouchable mode.
Get started for free.

Lakera Guard protects your LLM applications from cybersecurity risks with a single line of code. Get started in minutes. Become stronger every day.

Join our Slack Community.

Several people are typing about AI/ML security. 
Come join us and 1000+ others in a chat that’s thoroughly SFW.